Oracle Ranking Method

Top 5

1 PHI (7-0-0) —

2 BUF (6-1-0) ▲ 1

3 DAL (6-2-0) ▲ 1

4 NYG (6-2-0) ▼ 2

5 MIN (6-1-0) ▲ 1

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (6-0-0) —

2 NYG (6-1-0) ▲ 1

3 BUF (5-1-0) ▼ 1

4 DAL (5-2-0) ▲ 1

5 KC (5-2-0) ▲ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (6-0-0) —

2 BUF (5-1-0) ▲ 2

3 NYG (5-1-0) —

4 MIN (5-1-0) ▲ 2

5 DAL (4-2-0) ▼ 3

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (5-0-0) —

2 DAL (4-1-0) —

3 NYG (4-1-0) ▲ 5

4 BUF (4-1-0) —

5 KC (4-1-0) —

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (4-0-0) ▲ 1

2 DAL (3-1-0) ▲ 4

3 MIA (3-1-0) ▼ 2

4 BUF (3-1-0) ▲ 3

5 KC (3-1-0) ▲ 10

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 MIA (3-0-0) ▲ 1

2 PHI (3-0-0) ▼ 1

3 GB (2-1-0) ▲ 5

4 MIN (2-1-0) ▲ 3

5 TB (2-1-0) ▼ 1

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (2-0-0) ▲ 8

2 MIA (2-0-0) ▲ 5

3 KC (2-0-0) ▼ 2

4 TB (2-0-0) ▼ 2

5 BUF (2-0-0) ▼ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 KC (1-0-0) ▲ 2

2 TB (1-0-0) ▲ 2

3 BUF (1-0-0) ▲ 5

4 PIT (1-0-0) ▲ 8

5 LAC (1-0-0) ▲ 8

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 GB (13-3-0) —

2 TB (12-4-0) ▲ 1

3 KC (11-5-0) ▼ 1

4 LAR (12-4-0) ▲ 2

5 TEN (11-5-0) —

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 GB (12-3-0) —

2 KC (11-4-0) —

3 TB (11-4-0) —

4 DAL (11-4-0) —

5 TEN (10-5-0) ▲ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions