Oracle Ranking Method

Top 5

1 PHI (14-3-0) —

2 KC (14-3-0) —

3 BUF (13-3-0) ▲ 1

4 MIN (13-4-0) ▲ 1

5 CIN (12-4-0) ▲ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (13-3-0) —

2 KC (13-3-0) ▲ 2

3 DAL (12-4-0) ▲ 2

4 BUF (12-3-0) ▼ 2

5 MIN (12-4-0) ▼ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (13-2-0) —

2 BUF (12-3-0) —

3 MIN (12-3-0) —

4 KC (12-3-0) —

5 DAL (11-4-0) —

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (13-1-0) —

2 BUF (11-3-0) —

3 MIN (11-3-0) —

4 KC (11-3-0) ▲ 1

5 DAL (10-4-0) ▼ 1

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (12-1-0) —

2 BUF (10-3-0) ▲ 2

3 MIN (10-3-0) ▼ 1

4 DAL (10-3-0) ▼ 1

5 KC (10-3-0) —

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (11-1-0) —

2 MIN (10-2-0) —

3 DAL (9-3-0) ▲ 1

4 BUF (9-3-0) ▲ 1

5 KC (9-3-0) ▼ 2

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (10-1-0) —

2 MIN (9-2-0) —

3 KC (9-2-0) —

4 DAL (8-3-0) —

5 BUF (8-3-0) —

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (9-1-0) ▲ 1

2 MIN (8-2-0) ▼ 1

3 KC (8-2-0) ▲ 1

4 DAL (7-3-0) ▲ 5

5 BUF (7-3-0) ▲ 1

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 MIN (8-1-0) ▲ 1

2 PHI (8-1-0) ▼ 1

3 MIA (7-3-0) ▲ 2

4 KC (7-2-0) ▲ 4

5 NYG (7-2-0) ▲ 4

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions

Top 5

1 PHI (8-0-0) —

2 MIN (7-1-0) ▲ 3

3 BUF (6-2-0) ▼ 1

4 BAL (6-3-0) ▲ 3

5 MIA (6-3-0) ▲ 1

See full Oracle rankings and postseason predictions